1. Even though the field must be returned at Yovel and therefore the buyer only has a Kinyan Pe'iros, R. Yochanan holds that a Kinyan Pe'iros is like a Kinyan ha’Guf.

Since he doesn’t have a Kinyan on the Guf of the land he can’t read the words of the Parshah ‘the land that You gave me.’

Since he bought the tree without any land even according to R. Yochanan he may not read the Parshah of Bikurim because he doesn’t have any Kinyan on the land at all.

Because when a person buys thee trees he also receives the land between and around the trees.

5 Since they had not yet reached the first Yovel the seller was not completely confident that he would get his field back.

If a person is Makdish a Sadeh Achuzah (an inherited field) and the Gizbar of Hekdesh sells it to someone else it may no longer be redeemed and at Yovel it is divided up among the Kohanim. If a person is Makdish a Sadeh Mikneh (a purchased field) and the Gizbar of Hekdesh sells it to someone it is given back to the original owner at Yovel. Everyone agrees that a field that is bought from the father and the father dies prior to the Hekdesh of the field has a Din of a Sadeh Achuzah, the Machlokes is only when he was Makdish it before the father dies.

Since he holds that when brothers divide up the of their father they are regarded as buyers they only have a Kinyan Pe'iros and they would not read the Parshah of Bikurim if he held that a Kinyan Pe'iros is not a Kinyan ha’Guf

This is in accordance with the opinion that a Kinyan Pe'iros is not a Kinyan ha’Guf and therefore the father retained a Kinyan ha’Guf on the property and the Bechor has a right to a double portion.

This is in accordance with the opinion that a Kinyan Pe'iros is not a Kinyan ha’Guf and therefore although the husband owns the Pei'ros he is not regarded as the owner of the property.

1. If you sell a field in the times of Yovel, you only have Kinyan Peiros since it will go back in Yovel. Therefore R. Yochanan who holds K'Kinyan HaGuf says you may say the Parsha of Bikurim while Reish Lakish does not allow it since it is not considered your land.

Even Reish Lakish agrees that in the first Yovel where no one expected that the sale would go back on Yovel, the buyer may say the Parsha of Bikurim.

R' Yehuda, R. Shimon, and R. Meir all hold K'Kinyan HaGuf. The machlokes of a field of a son who buys it from his father and is Makdish it before the fahter dies is related to the drasha of the pasukim.

Brothers that split their deceased fathers field are like buyers from each other and redivide it after Yovel.

Since he holds that brother that split their fathers field are purchasers if he held that Kinyan Peiros in not Kinyan haGuf only a direct link to Yehoshua with only one son in each genration would be able to say the Parsha of Bikurim.

Both the pasuk and a Braisa hold like Reish Lakish

Since he only has Kinyan Peiros he needs Harsha'ah unless the Din Torah includes his Peiros. In that case he can argue about the Karka as well.

Iddis of Nizak is Min HaTorah but Mipnei Tikun HaOlam we give him Iddis of Mazik.